[Geopolitics Watch #01] What Are They Afraid Of? – Iran, Israel, and America's Core Strategic Fears

Discover the core fears driving Iran, Israel, and the U.S. in the Middle East crisis. An in-depth look at strategic paranoia shaping global geopolitics.

Stylized abstract globe design representing the geopolitical tensions between Iran, Israel, and the United States, with symbolic color patterns. No text, includes 'Sosan Daily' watermark.

1. Table of Contents

2. Introduction
3. Iran’s Fear
4. Israel’s Fear
5. America's Fear
6. Strategic Interactions Between the Three
7. Conclusion
8. FAQ

2. Introduction

In the shadow of a new Middle East crisis, a pressing question arises: what are Iran, Israel, and the United States truly afraid of? Beyond public speeches and surface-level strategies lie deep-seated fears that shape each nation's foreign policy. These anxieties—whether rooted in history, ideology, or survival—drive the Middle East’s ongoing volatility. This article explores the psychological and geopolitical undercurrents that define these nations’ behaviors and offers insight into what may come next.

3. Iran’s Fear: The Fall from Within

Iran’s ruling regime fears its own people more than any foreign power. While the state outwardly positions the U.S. and Israel as external enemies, its vast domestic surveillance network and violent crackdowns on protests point to a core anxiety: internal revolution. Since the Green Movement in 2009 and the Woman, Life, Freedom protests in 2022–2023, the Iranian leadership has increasingly viewed its youth, women, and educated middle class as existential threats to theocratic rule.

Sanctions may bite, and missiles may fall, but what truly haunts the Ayatollahs is the loss of ideological control. Censorship, religious policing, and loyalty-based purges across institutions are not just political tactics—they are survival instincts. Iran fears awakening a post-Islamic identity that no longer aligns with its current leadership.

4. Israel’s Fear: Existential Erasure

Israel’s central fear is annihilation. With memories of the Holocaust embedded into its national identity, and surrounded by hostile actors like Hezbollah and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, Israel lives with the constant anxiety of a “second Holocaust.” Its defense doctrine is built on overwhelming preemptive force, rapid retaliation, and intelligence superiority.

This fear also informs Israel’s controversial policies toward Gaza and the West Bank. Security is not a distant policy priority; it is the lens through which every policy, domestic or foreign, is filtered. While many criticize Israel for being overly aggressive, its internal calculus often returns to one imperative: “Never Again.”

5. America’s Fear: Losing Global Grip

For the United States, the Middle East is not about existential threats but about strategic leverage. America fears the erosion of its influence—whether through the rise of China, regional realignments, or weakened alliances. The fear is not physical vulnerability but geopolitical irrelevance.

Washington’s heavy military presence, massive arms sales, and investment in regimes (regardless of their democratic credentials) reflect a desire to maintain control. What happens in Tehran or Tel Aviv reverberates in Washington because the U.S. sees the Middle East as a proving ground for its global credibility.

A digital illustration featuring stylized portraits of Benjamin Netanyahu, Ali Khamenei, and Donald Trump, symbolizing the strategic fears of Israel, Iran, and the United States.

6. Strategic Interactions Between the Three

The strategic triangle between Iran, Israel, and the U.S. is shaped by both paranoia and pragmatism. Each sees the other as a threat, but also as a mirror reflecting its own weaknesses. Iran views Israel as an outpost of Western domination; Israel sees Iran as a genocidal regime; the U.S. sees both as pieces in a larger global chessboard.

These fears often align to produce temporary alliances or backchannel diplomacy—but also sudden escalations. Missiles, sanctions, and summits come in cycles, dictated not just by military needs but by psychological triggers. The fear of losing face, of seeming weak, often drives decision-making more than rational strategy.

7. Conclusion

Understanding what each nation fears offers more than just insight—it reveals pathways to de-escalation or, conversely, to catastrophe. Iran fears domestic collapse, Israel fears existential extinction, and the U.S. fears losing global dominance. These fears are not abstract—they are the invisible hands steering the course of conflict.

If diplomacy is to succeed, it must address not only weapons and borders but also these core fears. True peace is not built on agreements alone but on acknowledging the psychological wounds of history and the shared human desire for security and dignity.

8. FAQ

Q1: Why focus on "fears" instead of policies or alliances?
A: Strategic fears often reveal deeper truths than formal policies. While alliances change, the core existential concerns of nations—like regime survival, territorial integrity, or demographic threats—tend to persist and drive behavior more consistently.

Q2: Is Iran truly afraid of internal revolution more than external attack?
A: Yes. While Iran publicly denounces foreign enemies like the U.S. or Israel, its leadership devotes massive resources to domestic surveillance, censorship, and protest suppression—signs that internal dissent is its primary fear.

Q3: What drives Israel’s sense of existential vulnerability?
A: Israel is a small nation surrounded by historically hostile states and non-state actors. Its collective memory of the Holocaust, combined with ongoing missile threats from Iran and Hezbollah, fuels a deep-rooted fear of annihilation.

Q4: Why does the U.S. fear a loss of global control in the region?
A: America’s fear is less about physical security and more about geopolitical influence. Losing the Middle East to rival powers like China, or seeing allies like Israel weakened, threatens the credibility of U.S. global leadership.

Q5: Can these fears ever be reconciled, or are they permanent?
A: Some fears are deeply historical or ideological, making resolution difficult. However, diplomacy, shared interests (like trade or counterterrorism), and people-to-people engagement can gradually transform how these fears are managed—even if not fully erased.

Search This Blog

Sosan Daily